MOTION IN ARREST OF JUDGMENT (section 95 - T.I.A cap 23)

-

 MOTIONS IN ARREST OF JUDGMENT

Section 95 of the Uganda Trial on Indictments Act (as amended) cap 23 provides that;

"The accused person may at any time before sentence, whether on his or her plea of guilty or otherwise move in arrest of judgment on the ground that the Indictment does not, after any alteration which the court is willing and has power to make, state any offence which the Court has power to try"

Important to note is that the T.I.A cap 23 allows prosection to make alteration to an indictment for as long as it does not occasion an injustice to the accused or defence's case.

More to this, prosecution should take caution not to make an alteration whereby the evidence in the summary of the case is insufficient to support the offence. 

It is on this background that a motion in arrest of judgement may arise at any time of the trial before sentence.

When a defendant has been convicted of a criminal offense, the defendant may seek relief from his or her conviction by filing a motion in arrest of judgment. A motion in arrest of judgment suggests that the judgment has not been legally rendered. The motion may be oral or it may be in writing. Although the defendant may have a statutory right in some states to file the motion, the motion is seldom used and is rarely granted by a trial court.


That notwithstanding, A motion in arrest of judgment is a post-trial motion to quash a defendant’s indictment or information. The motion cannot be used to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence at the defendant’s trial. It may only be used to challenge the legal sufficiency of a trial court’s judgment.


A motion in arrest of judgment may be granted if a defendant’s indictment or information contained a substantial defect. For example, if the information was not signed by a district attorney or a state attorney, the information is defective. Also, if the indictment did not properly include all the elements of the defendant’s offense, it is defective. The motion may also be used if a jury’s verdict is defective as far as the allegations of the information or the indictment are concerned or if the verdict is otherwise invalid.


Motions in arrest of judgment are rarely used because defects regarding informations or indictments are more frequently raised by motions to quash the indictments or the informations. A motion to quash is preferable because it raises the insufficiency of the indictment or the information prior to trial.


In most states, a motion in arrest of judgment is limited to certain grounds. If a defendant does not adhere to those grounds, the prosecution may challenge the motion on appeal and may claim that there are procedural defects in the defendant’s motion.


A motion in arrest of judgment must be filed within a certain number of days after a defendant’s sentence has been imposed by a trial court. A motion in arrest of judgment can only be filed by a defendant. It cannot be filed by the prosecution. If the motion is not ruled upon by the trial court within a certain number of days, it is considered to be overruled.


A trial court has discretion whether to grant a hearing on a defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. If the trial court grants a hearing, the defendant’s presence is required because the hearing is considered to be a part of the defendant’s trial.


If a defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment is overruled, the period of time in which the defendant must file a notice of appeal begins to run. If the defendant’s motion is granted, the defendant’s judgment is arrested and the defendant is placed in the same position that he or she was in prior to his or her indictment or information. If a trial court determines that the defendant may be convicted upon a proper indictment or information, the defendant must be taken into custody or he or she must be released on bail. If the trial court determines that the defendant cannot be convicted upon a proper indictment or information, the defendant must be discharged.


"A family which reads together, passes together"

AHIMBISIBWE INNOCENT BENJAMIN

(Entertainment Lawyer)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The six major legal issues in Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd. Vs. Nassanga Saphinah Kasule (C.O.A CA. No. 182 of 2021)

-
Image
Stanbic Bank (Uganda) Limited versus Nassanga Saphinah Kasule (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 182 of 2021) raises numerous issues which are pertinent for us to understand. Click here to watch the case brief summary   In summary, this case discusses the following major points of law. 1. The Distinction between a Notice of Appeal under Rule 86 and a Notice of Cross Appeal under Rule 91 of the Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions. 2. The power of the Court of Appeal as the first appellate court in decisions from the Industrial Court. 3. Rights of an employee upon determination and rights upon dismissal for misconduct. 4. The difference between Pleadings and Witness Statements. 5. The significance of sticking to one's pleadings. 6. The Distinction between Exemplary and Aggravated Damages. Case Brief In this instance, the appellant submitted a preliminary objection under *Rule 86* to the striking out of a Notice of Cross Appeal, but the court overruled it, underlining that *R
Read more

Limitations: Can A Holder Of Powers Of Attorney Sue Or Defend On Behalf Of The Donor?

-
Image
The unanswered Question:  Despite the many opinions and articles on this topic, many have left a question hanging on the extent to Which Powers Of Attorney Give A Donnee, Power To Sue On Behalf Of The Donor. Can The Donnee Sue Or Defend On The Donor's Behalf? Can He Appear In Court As Claimant Or Defendant On The Donor's Behalf? A Power Of Attorney Is A Legal Document That Allows One Person To Act On Behalf Of Another. It Is Often Used In Legal, Financial, Or Medical Matters. Powers Of Attorney Can Be General Or Limited. By The Supreme Court Holding In Fredrick Zabwe V. Orient Bank (U) Ltd. SCCA No. 4/2006, It Is Imperative To Note That A Donee Of A Power Of Attorney Acts As An Agent Of The Donor And Should Do So For The Donor's Benefit. Well, More About Powers Powers Of Attorney Is Well Covered In Other Writings. In A 2021 Decision By The Supreme Court Of New York, Appellate Division Second Department In Discover Bank V. Gilliam 199 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021), The Ba
Read more

METHODS OF DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC ASSETS BY A PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ENTITY

-
Image
DISPOSAL   s.3 of the ppda , defines disposal as the divestiture of public assets including intellectual and proprietary rights and good will and any other rights of a procuring and disposing entity by any means, including sale, rental, lease, franchise, auction or any combination however classified   the disposal process is defined as the successive stages in the disposal cycle including planning, choice of procedure, measures to solicit offers from bidders, examination and evaluation of those offers and award of contract.     methods of disposal  s.79 (1) of ppda requires that the choice of a procurement or disposal method must first be approved by the contracts committee  under s.87 (1) the methods of disposal of public assets include public auction public bidding direct negotiation sale to public officer destruction of the asset conversion or classification of assets into another form for disposal by sal trade-i transfer to another procuring and disposing entity donation A1. public
Read more